Thursday, January 31, 2008

Romney Should Drop Out

The conventional wisdom from the meanstream media (stole that from another poster at Huck's Army) is that the GOP race is down to two people – McCain vs. Romney. Mitt, of course, has seized on this theme and has asserted that a vote for Governor Huckabee is a vote for John McCain. If this is truly to become a two-man race, and the goal is to defeat the momentum-laden McCain (assuming last night's woeful performance in the debate didn't stop his momentum in its tracks), then the best thing to do is coalesce around the most conservative candidate, the most electable candidate, the candidate with the most upside. That candidate is not Mitt Romney; it's Mike Huckabee.

Most Conservative


Mitt likes to proclaim himself the standard-bearer on the 3-legged stool of conservatism, with the 3 legs being social, fiscal, and national security issues. Like he triumphantly proclaimed last night that of course Ronald Reagan would endorse him. But just because i can slap on a glove and cleats doesn't mean you should put me in at shortstop. Is Mitt Romney the Sidd Finch of politics? Is there any there there?

Consider the 3 leg formulation.

  • Social – even if we believe that Romney has finally hit his conservative political puberty and has truly converted to the prolife position (at most it's a position with him, not a cause) and other social conservative bona fides, he would still lag far behind Governor Huckabee's convictions, record, and prospects on this leg. A big win for Huckabee
  • National Security – Like almost all governors, you'll find little directly relevant foreign policy experience for either candidate. This would turn on judgment, toughness, and leadership. I'm not impressed with Romney's CEO experience and so don't give the leadership advantage that he surely thinks he owns. I believe Huckabee has better judgment and would be tougher with aggressive regimes.
  • Fiscal – Romney believes this is his trump card. But here's your trump card...

TAX FREEDOM DAY

A tax freedom day is the day in the calendar when you've worked long enough in the new year to afford to pay all your taxes. It's a sad commentary on our times, but this date is usually in April, and seems to fall later and later (see table 1 at the link) all the time. In 2007, it is estimated that the national tax freedom day was April 30th. So let's compare the records of Governors Huckabee and Romney in their respective states, looking at the Tax Freedom Day when they took office vs. when each left office.

Governor/State

TFD – Start

TFD - End

Net Effect

Huckabee / AR

April 22

April 22

Same

Romney / MA

April 21

May 6

15 days WORSE

If you don't mind working an extra two weeks for the government, then by all means believe the talking heads that Romney is the fiscal conservative.

Most Electable

I covered this in my Typologies post, showing the polling evidence that Governor Huckabee would be a better general election candidate than Romney. You can also look at the head to head polls compiled at RCP. Against Clinton, Huckabee fares 2-3 points better than Romney does. Against Obama, Huckabee also fares better than does Romney. Granted, neither candidate is polling well against those two right now, but this has been a consistent pattern – Huckabee trumps Romney. Governor Huckabee is more electable than Governor Romney, based on all the evidence we have to study.

Most Upside

Romney has had the powerful two-pronged advantage of both MONEY and MEDIA behind him, and still hasn't won a contested primary other than Michigan, which is practically home for him, given that his father was a popular governor there.

Think about it. Romney has outspent even his well-funded rivals by orders of magnitude that boggle the mind. Millions upon millions on negative ads, distortions of the records of the other candidates. He has all the power of talk radio behind him, all the conservative establishment media serving as surrogate mouthpieces for his campaign.

And what does he have to show for it? If he hasn't been able to beat McCain up until now, why would he all of sudden start doing it next Tuesday or beyond? If anyone should drop out, it should be Romney.
The conservative establishment should try something else. That something else is, of course, Governor Huckabee.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

FYI Huck is a one hit wonder so dont bother. He is ranked same a Ron Paul on intrade (betting). Both are given 1.3% chance to win. Romney has 14% chance. I'll take 14 over 1.3 thank you very much.

me4you said...

I think that if Huckabee is truly commited to his ideas and standards than he needs to dropout and endorse someone who has a chance, that would be Romney. Maybee Mcain is paying Huckabee just to stay in, after all Huckabee is really short on cash.

oso diablo said...

methinks you folks didn't even read the post. Or consider national polls which have Huckabee & Romney neck & neck. Here's one...

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/080124_Released.pdf

It shows that Huckabee has higher positive ratings than Romney, and lower negative ratings. And Huckabee has a 3 point lead overall over Romney.

Romney had his chance and didn't connect. It's time for something different.

oso diablo said...

me4you, Q4 campaign finances were released today, and Huckabee & Romney are close in cash on hand. Romney had about $2.4 million, and Huckabee had $1.9 million. Frugality. You guys should check it out.

Anonymous said...

Who is most fiscally conservative; how much has each candidate spent per vote? Romney sure loses there. RoeGone.org shows Romney's social NON-conservative record. Massachusetts owes a lot of moral decay to Romney's executive bullying. Have you read Huckabee's speech about the dangers of Islamic fascist?
http://www.conservative.org/pressroom/2007/speech_huckabee.asp
Score Huckabee 3
Romney 0
Mike Huckabee is the only consistent conservative.

Anonymous said...

Romney has no business being in the race at this point in time as the only result of his continued presence will be either the election of John McCain or the election of Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama.

Romney has never won a race in which he didn't: a) grow up there, or b) run without active opposition. Not the mark of a guy with a future as POTUS.

He's spend $40 million dollars and gotten such a bad ROI that it threatens his reputation as a smart and successful businessman. Almost all of the other Republican candidates personally dislike him. Many in the general public think he's phony. He should go out, use the money and buy an NFL team or something else that would be a lot more fun than being humiliated contest after contest with no light at the end of the tunnel.